December 2004 Reviews |
|
Here are our latest spam filtering product reviews. We test each product and recommend only the best.
![]() |
We gave top honors to Giant Company's Spam Inspector program (read review). This product stops more spam (98%) than any other product on the market. Frequent updates and a low price make it a good choice for nearly everyone. Giant Company offers a free trial , so if you're in a hurry, you can download a 15-day trial version here for free. For a limited time, SpamReviews is offering its readers a $10 discount - see our review page for details. |
Below you will find side-by-side comparisons of the top spam filtering products. You can click through to read detailed reviews of the products (more coming in the following weeks), or simply scroll through to the end of this page to see more summarized reviews.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More Quick Reviews
![]() |
Lashback stopped more spam (94%) than every other product with the exception of Spam Inspector. It features an attractive and easy-to-use interface, along with good reporting and other features not found in SpamKiller, our 3rd rated product. |
SpamKiller filtered almost all spam (92% blocked) and has many additional useful features not found in most products. It is a little more expensive than Spam Inspector and the purchase price only includes a one-year subscription, but we found it to be a solid product.
EmailProtect provides better filtering (stopped 72% of spam) than most products. It has a tendency to block opt-in newsletters, but overall it's a very good product.
Matador stopped most of the spam (82%)that we tested with. However, we ranked it lower because it was lacking in featires and was higher priced than other more effective products.
SpamNet also provides good protection (82%), but not perfect. It lacks any additional features beyond spam filtering and it is higher priced than our top picks.
Spam
Butcher provided below average protection against spam (42%) and
blocked a lot of legitimate email. It is a light on features and higher priced
than other more effective products.
Spam
Eater Pro provided average protection against spam (53%), scored
poorly for usability, and was among the slowest of the products we tested.
Qurb provided poor protection against spam (26%) and tended to quarantine legitimate email from senders we didn’t explicitly put in our approved senders list.
Printer-friendly version

Email to a friend
Posted by rich at December 11, 2004 02:39 PM | TrackBack










